Interaction design case study
Atlassian, 2018Developing an intuitive drag-and-drop system to manage projects with complex data requirements
Problem
As part of the Portfolio for Jira redesign , we needed to solve the challenge of “how might we allow users to prioritise and plan their work?”. A crucial feature involved allowing users to create/group projects and tasks, placing them directly onto a roadmap.
Process and solution
Static mocks or basic Figma prototypes alone wouldn't be enough for a successful design. They are too limited. Because of this, I worked with a pair of front-end developers on a coded prototype that would explore drag and drop for both ranking items in a list, and creating and dragging issues on a timeline. This took about one week.
We faced hundreds of decisions with no clear answers. For example, when creating an issue on the timeline:
- Should a user click, hold, + drag?
- Single or double click to create a default size, then resize as needed?
- Should any preview bar be left, center, or right aligned to the cursor? And so on…
In the prototype we created what we called the “god mode” that let us play with different parameters. I could then look at a particular problem, adjust sliders and see all the possibilities and make a quick decision on what to do. It was easy to tell interaction patterns that simply didn’t feel right, or were harder to complete. Here are a few examples of interactions possible in the coded prototype:
Here are some of the final interactions
Success measurement
To know that our drag and drop solution worked, from a user’s perspective we needed to see
- Can users complete the task?
- How difficult did they find it to complete the task?
- Does it “feel” right. Or “did this interaction behave the way you expected it to?”
User testing with beta customers was well received. The main improvements flagged was for “I made this change, help me understand how feasible it is”, than the interaction model itself.